|
|
|
|
The Millennium Much has been written about the short period of time referred to as the tribulation. Little is written about the greater period of time called the Millennium. The bible shows this to be an exciting period of time where the natural hope of Israel is realized on the earth, and the kingdom of God stands unopposed for a thousand years - A time where the saints of the previous age rule and reign with Christ and the justice of the Lord is established - An age where divine government proceeds from New Jerusalem. As one looks at what the bible has to say about this period, it adds a dimension to our hope in the future that makes the trials of this time not worth comparing to the glory that will be revealed. (Romans 8:18) What follows is a look at what the bible says about the “New Day”. The Millennium. The Revelation account of the release of Satan.
There seems to be a sequential order to the Greek in the presentation of the events in chapter twenty. The Greek article translated ‘then’ (rev. 20:11) in the NIV, New King James, and NASU seems to fit the verb cases used in these verses. In this account, sequentially, Satan is released, goes out to deceive the nation in the four corners of the world who in turn attack the city where the saints are, fire comes down and they are devoured - killed. Then the Devil is sentenced first to the Lake of fire. Then it tells of the resurrection of the dead, and all the dead being gathered for judgment and that would include those who have attacked the city. That is the sequence that this account uses. Let’s take a ‘lets suppose’ approach here. Let’s suppose there is a group of flesh and blood survivors who are left alive at the beginning of the millennium. They live out the thousand years by making trips to the city and drinking from the river of life coming out of the city. Much the same as Adam and Eve who ate of the tree of life in the middle of the garden until they were mercifully kept from it by an angel with a sword after they fell. For that matter, dying would not be out of the question either, because death isn’t declared over until the new heavens and the new earth in Revelation 21. The devil has not been testing theirs or their children’s level of commitment for a thousand years. They have had no decisions to make about God. Why does it say, “after these things he must be released for a short time.”? (Rev 20:3) Maybe because they must be presented with a choice as we all were, including the angels? Some decide wrong and are destroyed, later to be resurrected for judgment when they will be judged according to their deeds. Maybe these of the millennium are those who aren’t old enough to take the mark of the beast during the reign of the anti-christ. Maybe there’s a small group of holdouts who haven’t gotten the mark but haven’t made a commitment to Jesus either. Maybe they are natural Israel. We won’t to try to establish who they are yet. We’re still in the ‘lets suppose’ mode. ‘The nations’ talked about in that verse have to come from somewhere. Interestingly enough the term used to describe their number is the same term used to describe Abraham’s natural seed in Genesis, again in Isaiah and quoted in Romans. [Rom 9:27-28 Isaiah cries out concerning Israel: "Though the number of the Israelites be like the sand by the sea, only the remnant will be saved. 28 For the Lord will carry out his sentence on earth with speed and finality."] Could be just a phrase but it does seem to relate to this quite strongly.
Questions… What world will the saints judge? When? Not in this life has it happened. Not the judgment seat of Christ as Revelation says quite plainly they will be judged by “Him who sat on it” in reference to the great white throne. So whom will we judge? It hasn’t happened yet. Is there evidence to support the concept of ruling in the millennium over the nations? If we reign with Christ whom do we reign over? All our resurrected brethren? It doesn’t seem all that necessary being we no longer have a body of sin and are under the authority of God as his priests and rulers. While we can assume there is hierarchy within the kingdom of God, the sense of ruler-ship that the passages about reigning give don’t seem to lend themselves to this concept. What has Jesus had to say about twelve thrones and judging the twelve tribes (Matthew 19:28) and some being given cities to rule who has been faithful in little (Luke 19:9-23)? What nations will the over comers of the church in Thyatira have authority over? (Revelations 2:26) So many questions and the only answer that seems to fit all questions without conflict, is the concept of nations being ruled out of New Jerusalem as the saints rule with Jesus. For a thousand years there’s a world free from the Prince of Darkness and now, under the authority of Him who rules with Justice – an iron scepter. The last Adam, a life giving spirit doing what the first Adam should have done except the first Adam didn’t defeat Satan and the rule was taken from his hand and ended up with Satan until Jesus retrieved it. He - Jesus - will lay it again with all things at the feet of the Father.
The account in Revelation says only that those who have part in the first resurrection are blessed because they have nothing to fear from the second death. It has no power over them. It does not say that everyone who takes part in the second resurrection is thrown into the lake of fire. Do those of the nations who are not deceived by Satan find their names in the Lamb’s book of life, their deeds during the millennium not bringing them into judgment because they have chosen God through Jesus reigning in the city? What prevents it from being so? There seems to be biblical support for it. The Bible says there will be a resurrection of the just and the unjust. Some assumed they would take place at different times, but the resurrection of the two types – just and unjust are never given as separate resurrection times. Just separate outcomes of an event – the resurrection. There are two resurrection types – just and unjust. It is only in Revelation that the two times for the resurrection are introduced. While it’s clear there are no unjust in the first resurrection, it isn’t clear that there are only unjust in the second resurrection. It could then follow that not every one resurrected in the resurrection that is other than the “first resurrection” is found absent from the book of life. This argument will be discussed in greater detail later. For now just note that they too, could have chosen right and been given at the judgment their new resurrected body for the new heavens and new earth that is to come while hell and death (including those whose death followed the attack on the city) are resurrected for the second death at the same resurrection time and thrown into the lake of fire. There seems to be looking at the following scriptures. These passages create so many questions again, that seem to only have an answer in the concept of people giving birth and visiting the city of God that houses the saints - of coming down to drink from the river of life - of living in a creation at peace with itself, the curse lifted and Satan locked up. Jesus says that the resurrected will be as the angels, neither marrying or being given in marriage, so who’s having children? Not the saints. It would have to come from flesh and blood not yet resurrected.
So we find that little children and infants are present in circumstances that haven’t happened yet and don’t seem likely this side of the millennium. We find nations outside the city coming to the city for healing and a river of life flowing from the city to the east and the west. One keeps coming to the same conclusion as the Jews who were waiting for Jesus to restore the kingdom to Jerusalem. [“So when they met together, they asked him, "Lord, are you at this time going to restore the kingdom to Israel?" Acts 1:6] It seems that the Jews felt and that the Old Testament indicated that at sometime after the time of the Gospels, the nations of the earth relate to Jerusalem as the governmental center and seek the Lord there. At sometime the Lord reigns from Jerusalem over the nations of the earth with his people. This “sometime” hasn’t happened yet. Everything seems to point to a millennium government over natural people. Those in the city are related to as the people of God. His chosen ones are now those in the city and the city seems much sought by those who live outside the city on the face of the earth. The Jews were thinking it would be them in the city, but the promise went to the spiritual first and not the natural. (See Paul’s letter to the Galatians on this subject) Year after year they go up to the City. The leaves on the trees in the city are for healing. The resurrected saints don’t need healing. The saints have eternal life in their new resurrected bodies. The resurrected saints don’t need the river of life. If however you have a natural people who are propagating the Earth, you still have need of healing from environmental aging and injury until the governmental period is over and the final resurrection takes place. This last resurrection will be a resurrection of the unjust for those already dead apart from God and for those who attack the city, but a resurrection of the just for those who don’t attack the city when Satan is released - those who do not align themselves with Satan and who chose the Lord reigning in Jerusalem with his previously resurrected saints. Everyone gets resurrected. Those who have done evil are thrown in the lake of fire and those who have called on the name of the Lord are part of the new heavens and the new earth. In the millennium, the curses are gone and the blessings remain. For a thousand years the land produces and the labor of the nations is no longer cursed. The Prince of Darkness is in chains being held for one final release to give those born during the millennium a chance to exercise their freedom of choice. Does natural Israel find its part in the millennium? Is this the mystery that Paul talks about in Romans 11:25-28? (It would not be out of the question that the age of the gentiles might very well come to an end at the end of this age and the age of natural Israel begin again at the start of the millennium. It says that in the fullness of time God will again call Israel but their hearts are hardened until the time of the gentiles is over.??!!) Having natural peoples/nations in the millennium seems probable. It fits the sequential tenor of the account in Revelation. It doesn’t disagree with any of the basic foundational doctrines of salvation through Jesus and the coming judgment and the resurrections. It fits with the concept of the kingdom of God vs. the kingdom of Darkness. The current legal position of the saint as an ambassador of the kingdom of God to this world - representing His authority in the kingdoms of this world - lends itself also to a coming governorship in a millennial kingdom. And this is the point that seems to seal it. The first will be last and the last first scripture (Matthew 19:28- 20:16, Mark 10:29-31, Luke 13:28-30) finds greater definition in light of these things and relating it to the resurrection. Those chosen first are the last to be resurrected. Those chosen last are those in the first resurrection. The time of the Gentiles are over and now in preparation for the last, Israel - natural Israel spends a thousand years preparing for its resurrection. In the parable of the laborers that receive reward for the labors, the owner paid the last of those to be hired first – with the resulting complaints which he answered and then gave the first/last reply. Then the scripture that Paul talks about in Romans 9:27-29) while quoting Isaiah finds fulfillment. There are other minor passages that also lend themselves to this line of thinking, but these are the main ones.
The unsaved gentiles come to the end of their time by giving ruler ship and allegiance to the anti-christ. God’s judgments are brought on the earth. Right before the earthquake, the voice shouts “it is done!” (Revelation 16:17) [an interesting parallel to the start of the time of the Gentiles] and thus ends the time of the Gentiles. Christ returns to rule with his saints over the natural Israeli survivors of the attack of Armageddon and there is the subsequent earthquake. The time of the gentiles is concluded and their full number brought in. God now turns to complete His promise to the Jews. All the Old Testament prophecies that remain are completed in the millennium and the Jews accept the kingship of the one they pierced. We, the last to be chosen and the first to be resurrected, rule and reign with Christ and His twelve disciples of the lamb who are sitting on twelve thrones and ruling over the twelve tribes of Israel with all the rest of us who are in Christ. After the thousand years, the first to be chosen, natural Israel, is the last to be resurrected. In the second resurrection we have both the resurrection of the just to eternal life and a new resurrected body and a resurrection of the unjust to judgment. The earth and heavens are "made new:" and the former things are remembered no more as an eternity with God in His creation begins. We will then no longer have times and years but the eternity as all of the prophecies and promises of God to the earth and to His people have been fulfilled. While I do not yet teach this as established doctrine, I am convinced that this interpretation of the relevant scriptures answers many of the doctrinal questions that a "resurrected only" populated Millennium doctrine leaves unaswered. I find it answers many questions that linger over the unfulfilled prophecies in the Old Testament. I believe it brings more satisfactory answers to some questions and creates less if any conflict with present truth. I welcome any further input or biblical textual problems the reader might see in this presentation. This is my belief and the results of my study on the Millennium. Pastor John |
|
|
the
Place |